The Nodal Point of the lens (or more correctly, the entrance pupil) can be considered as the point at which the rays entering the lens converge. It can also be considered as the centre of perspective of the lens or the apparent pupil. This point can be considered as the No Parallax Point (NPP) or Front Nodal Point as the lens also has a Rear Nodal Point and in a simple lens the two nodes converge to a single point.
The term Nodal Point is used here because for decades it has been accepted as the term defining the point where the rays entering the lens apparently converge and has been referred to by this nomenclature in a considerable number of Photogrammetric papers and publications, but let us not let terminology detract from the message. What we are interested in is the directions (or vectors) of the rays entering the lens.
It is important to know the location of this point (entrance pupil) for Photogrammetric purposes. To enable the correct origin and orientation in space of the rays used to compute the intersection when using the technique of Photographic Intersection it is important that this point is determined as accurately as possible. It is also vital that this point is known for applications such as using the photographic image in conjunction with HDS (High Definition Surveying) data and for any application for where an equirectangular image is to be produced using software such as PTGui.
This point is the ideal point to rotate your lens around to eliminate parallax when taking images to ‘stitch’ together to produce panoramic images, especially 360° Panoramas. If you are creating a panorama of objects very close to the camera then serious consideration needs to be given to this point to eliminate parallax as shown in the image to the right, but if your panoramas are of features tens or hundreds of metres from the camera, such as a landscape panorama, then you will not need to give too much thought to this point.
Photogrammetric camera lenses are constructed so as to be ‘symmetrical’. The mounting of the Wild P32, shown in the image, on a theodolite was arranged so that the front nodal point of the lens was coincident with the standing axis of the theodolite when the telescope was truly horizontal even though this meant that the camera was not well balanced. In normal photographic lenses, such as those we would select for Photographic Intersection, this point is often not a single point but ‘slides’ along the principal ray of the lens depending on the angle between the ray being considered and the principal ray. For the purposes of Photographic Intersection the position of these points should be determined for the widest angle of view for the lens, although there is the opportunity to introduce the different locations as another parameter in the computation process.
Finding the location of the Nodal Point (Entrance Pupil, No Parallax Point (NPP))
The Nodal Point or entrance pupil can be measured as part of the camera and lens calibration process using a calibration rig constructed for determining the parameters of the camera and lens for photogrammetric purposes. Such setups are few and far between, and even if you do locate one, the cost of the calibration will probably be more than the value of the equipment you are calibrating, which defeats the object of using Photographic Intersection as a low cost method of accurately measuring 3D points. It is therefore desirable to find a way of determining the Nodal Point yourself with easy to obtain and low cost items.
At the end of the 1970s, beginning of the 1980s, I used a method similar to that described by Michel Thoby with nails and banknotes except that I used needles and the face of an “E” survey staff or tape measure.
The important thing is that the foreground objects do not obscure too much of the background and that the background has sufficient detail to identify accurately the part obscured in the image by the foreground objects.
The technique is to make an image of the scene, then use the detail of the background object obscured by the foreground objects to reconstruct the rays that converge at the Nodal Point and thus define it. It is imperative that nothing in the arrangement must be disturbed whilst a suitable print of the scene is made so that the rays can be accurately drawn. In the digital age this is not so much of a problem but when film is used keeping the scene intact can be a problem. A disadvantage of this method is that using nails or needles with a background quite near to the lens is that the lens is close focused to keep the detail sharp in the image, but that the lens will more likely to be focused at or near infinity when actually used for measurement. The Nodal Point can change with focusing in some lenses. This can be overcome by going outside and using canes, ranging rods or dowels as the foreground objects with say a building facade as the background image and with the camera and lens on a “Plane Table”. Keeping the arrangement undisturbed whilst processing film and printing a decent size image was even more of a challenge! Note that the camera has been rotated around its principal ray so that the diagonal of the field of view is used to get the maximum angle of view, a technique that can be used with both the other methods following.
Having experimented with all techniques posted here, this is clearly the most precise, closely followed by the method using a laser pointer. As we are now well and truly in the ‘digital age’ this method is less trouble than in the age of film as the positions of the camera, ‘pins’ and ‘target’ (e.g. tape measure) can be accurately measured and and imported into a CAD application where the ‘rays’ can then be ‘drawn’ and their intersection with the principal ray determined.
This method is also suitable for cameras with a tiny or no view screen, such as dual and multi lens cameras.
A simple method …
A simpler method of determining the Nodal Point is to place an object (thin pole or wire) near the lens and align it with a more distant object. If the camera is rotated about the Front Nodal Point the two objects will be aligned when they are in the centre of the image and also when at each side of the image. If the objects are aligned when in the centre of the image but appear to separate as the camera is rotated then the rotation is not about the Nodal Point. This method may be simpler than the first method described, but is more fiddly and less accurate.
To determine the Front Nodal Point of a Nikon 18-70 mm zoom lens set at 18 mm, a 10 mm dowel was positioned some 7 m in front of the camera so that it was aligned with the apex of the roof of a house some 200 m away. The camera was rotated around the tripod mounting point in the base, which is behind the Nodal Point, and a point a similar distance in front of the Nodal Point to illustrate the apparent movement of the dowel relative to the roof apex if the camera is not rotated about the Front Nodal Point.
When the camera is rotated about the Front Nodal Point the dowel is still aligned with the apex of the roof of the house at both the Left and Right edges of the image. Note that this is at the Front Nodal Point for that particular angle of incidence if the lens does not have a single point for the Nodal Point as in some of the examples following.
In this case the camera was rotated about the tripod mounting point, which is behind the Nodal Point. This is the normal case for a camera mounted on a tripod using the ¼” Whitworth thread in the camera’s base plate.
To show the effect of the rotation of the camera in front of the Nodal Point the camera was mounted on a bar so that the rotation point was approximately as far in front of the Nodal Point as the ¼” Whitworth thread in the camera’s base plate is behind the Nodal Point.
Using a Laser Pointer …
The most innovative and inspired method I have come across recently is that used by Michel Thoby with a laser pointer. As Michel states, you only need the lens for this method. However, having the lens mounted on a film camera with the shutter open on bulb and the back open means that you can calibrate any lens as the lens axis will always be the same height above the surface. This means that it is easier to construct your laser alidade with a fixed height for the laser above the surface. When the laser beam travels along the path of a ray that meets the Nodal Point, a very bright spot is seen on the surface (white card) placed behind the lens and the ray can be drawn on the paper. These rays can be constructed for a variety of angles of incidence and the Nodal Point determined.
This method is remarkably precise and accurate results can be obtained quickly and easily. The position of the lens, especially the front which will be used as the reference, can be orthographically projected onto the paper using a simple set square.
Finding the Nodal Point without a Panohead …
Setting up a laser is time consuming and fiddly but another method proposed by Michel Thoby more recently provides a simpler solution.
The camera and lens is placed on a sheet of paper as with the method of using a laser pointer but this is replaced with a ‘target’ which is essentially a ruler with two thin vertical sighting vanes.
This device is placed in front of the lens and rotated until the two vanes line up when viewed through the viewfinder or on the ‘live screen’ of the camera and a line drawn on the paper along the straight edge connecting the two vertical vanes.
This is repeated for different ‘angles’ building up a diagram of the pattern of rays entering the lens and the Nodal Point (NPP) is determined by where the lines intersect with the ‘principal ray’ of the lens.
The position of the lens, especially the front which will be used as the reference, can be orthographically projected onto the paper using a simple set square.
I found this method quite difficult sighting the ‘target’ with the viewfinder or on the ‘live screen’, especially with finding the NPP for Fisheye lenses for 360° Panoramas. Also, this method would not be suitable for finding the NPP of dual or multi lens cameras with tiny or no view screen so I decoded to modify this method with the principal of the ‘simple method’.
A simple method – modified …
A straight forward method to determine the Nodal Point (NPP) of Fisheye lenses, including those on dual or multi lens cameras with tiny or no view screens, is to plot the rays on paper radiating from a reference point. The camera is then positioned so that front of the lens is coincident with this reference point. Images are then captured moving the camera forward two millimetres at a time ensuring that the camera is moved sufficiently to ensure that the NPP will be covered. The images can then be viewed comfortably on a computer and the NPP for a particular angle of incidence can be determined by the distance in front of the lens where the line drawn on the paper is vertical in the image. Typically the NPP is not a single point, as shown in the following examples, so for 360° Panoramas I select the NPP for the ‘join’ angle for stitching the images (e.g. 45° from the principal ray for 4 shots round and 30° from the principal ray for 6 shots round). If this is the case then it is only necessary to plot the required rays on the paper. The image to the left shows screen captures at 250% of the position for a Pergear 7.5 mm Fisheye lens for the 45° ray at 2 mm intervals in front of the reference point at the front of the lens with vertical red lines superimposed so it is easy to locate the NPP at say 45° (4 shots round) for this lens.
Results from determining the location of the Nodal Point (No Parallax Point) of a selection of lenses.
The position of the Nodal Point, and its behavior, clearly depends on the lens design and construction.
The illustrations shown here have been determined using the ‘Laser Pointer’ and/or the ‘Pins & Tape Measure’ methods.
The Sigma 10 to 20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens zoom lens actually has the Front Nodal Point at a point and this location remains the same irrespective of the distance the lens is focused for. It is the same point whether the lens is focuses at infinity or close focused.
|The Front Nodal Point on the Sigma 10 to 20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM Lens zoom lens moves away from the front of the lens as the focal length is increased by zooming and is some 19mm back from the front of the lens when set at the 20mm focal length.
At the 20mm setting the Nodal Point is coincident with the gold ring and remains in the same place as the lens is focused.
|The Nikon 28mm f2.8 D AF lens demonstrates how the Front Nodal Point “slides” along the principle ray (lens axis) in some lens designs. As the angle of view increases, the Nodal Point moves back, away from the front of the lens.
Here the lens is focused at infinity and the Nodal Point is some 20mm from the front of the lens and shows a spread of some 4mm with the angles of view used.
|The Nikon 18 to 200mm f3.5-5.6 G AF-S VR lens set at 18mm shows a similar consistency to the Sigma 10 to 20mm, with a slight change between focus at infinity and close focused.
For use with a Panoramic head for 360° Panoramas, the Nodal Point can be considered as 32mm back from the front rim of the lens.
|The Nikon 10.5mm f2.8 G ED Fisheye shows the reverse effect to the Nikon 28mm lens in that the Front Nodal Point “slides” along the principal ray but moves closer to the front of the lens as the angle of view increases.
The Nodal Point for this lens also varies according to the focus and has less of a spread when close focused than when focused at infinity.
This a DX lens with a fixed lens hood which needs to be removed (shaved) for use with an FX body.
|The Sigma 8mm f3.5 EX DG Fisheye shows the same characteristics as the Nikon 10.5mm Fisheye lens in that the Front Nodal Point “slides” along the principal ray and moves closer to the front of the lens as the angle of view increases.
The Nodal Point for this lens also varies according to the focus and has less of a spread when close focused than when focused at infinity.
|The Sigma 4.5mm f2.8 EX DC Fisheye shows the same characteristics as the Sigma 8mm Fisheye lens in that the Front Nodal Point “slides” along the principal ray and moves closer to the front of the lens as the angle of view increases.|
|The Samyang 8mm f3.5 FISH-EYE CD shows the same pattern as the other fisheye lenses, but with a much tighter range for the entrance pupil, which is due to the different design as described by LensTip.com and Michel Thoby.
This design would suggest that this is a more suitable lens for Spherical (360°) Panoramas than the “conventional” fisheye lenses and its considerably lower cost makes it an attractive option.
|The Tamron PZD 16 to 300mm f3.5-6.3, suitable for use with an DX [APS-C] sensor, shows the opposite movement of the NPP (No Parallax Point) to the Fisheye lenses in a similar manner to the Nikon 28 mm f2.8 D AF, when set at 16 mm and focused at infinity.|
|The Tamron PZD 16 to 300mm f3.5-6.3, suitable for use with an FX sensor, shows the opposite movement of the NPP (No Parallax Point) to the Fisheye lenses in a similar manner to the Nikon 28 mm f2.8 D AF, when set at 28 mm and focused at infinity.|
|The Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 DG II HSM, for use with an FX sensor, shows the same characteristics as the Sigma 10 to 20mm f4-5.6 HSM for use with a DX sensor with the NPP (No Parallax Point) some 1.6 mm back from the back of the fixed lens hood, when set at 12 mm and focused at infinity.|
|The NPP pattern for the Pergear 7.5mm Fisheye is different to that of most fisheye lenses. This is a DX lens with a fixed metal lens hood which needs to be removed (shaved) for use with an FX body. It is a totally manual lens so has no exif data so an FX body does not recognize it as a DX lens and switch to DX mode automatically so uses the FX image format. The NPP for the rays at 45° to the principal ray (4 shots round) is 18 mm back from the front of the lens.|
|The Samsung Gear 360 camera is designed for the two hemispherical images to be ‘joined’ using ActionDirector but experiments with using the camera for measurement revealed that taking four shots round and stitching the four shots for the front lens in PTGui produced a more accurate equirectangular than ‘joining’ the two hemispheres in ActionDirector. The equirectangular created by stitching the four images in PTGui is also some 30% bigger than that produced in ActionDirector.|
|Whilst determining the NPP for the two previous lenses I though it would be interesting to see how the Insta360 ONE X2 behaved given that the geometry is different as the sensor is not perpendicular to the principal ray entering the lens. To stitch four shots round in PTGui rotating the camera round its vertical axis (tripod bush) provides a good result with the equirectangular about the same size as that using Insta360 Studio to ‘join’ the to hemispheres.|